I am very tolerant, but the starting division and budding begins to scare ...
relatively fresh news: about 10 design companies were involved in the construction city for gays, which will be located in the U.S. state of California. That is, as I understand it, non-gay ban in the city live. And then we will observe the standard American attraction - the court, and compensation for infringement. There any heterosexual who wants to settle in the town, he refused, he sue, win a lot of money and still inhabit the town. Spoiling the whole liturgy, that is violating the basic principle of the city - a city for gays. :-)
All anything, But already there is a town for old people in Japan and the city for women in Sweden. Will soon be the city for bestiality, for young people under the age of 20 years for black women with disabilities ... On every road sign will say who can live in a city or even to appear, and who can not ...
then any internal boundaries and ghettos in the cities. Indeed, in the elderly should also someone to work, and they want to live closer to work. Or, for example, in the women's city will man ... Yes, and for disabled people healthy people are not interfere in the city ...
In general, all right, but to no good are separated from the main body of the people will not IMHO. better tolerance to itself the money raised would be. Or even better would be if ... (Tactfully say nothing, and then nabegut, trampled ...). :-)
0 comments:
Post a Comment